Lenovo 30B6S1ER02

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 30B6S1ER02  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1030
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '21 at 18:13
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49% Average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 53
2-Core 108
44% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 409
36% 307 Pts
64-Core 557
34% 557 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.7% Below average
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 36.2
31% 38 fps
MRender 50.2
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 38.6
34% 42.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 835 922 1131 710 813 758 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,836
Write 763
Mixed 704
SusWrite 862
230% 1,041 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 35.3
129% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 689
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 540
408% 554 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 190%
Great: 329%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-UH 4x16GB
4 of 12 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.2% Above average
MC Read 24
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 19.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30B6S1ER02 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Lenovo 30B6S1ER02

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback