Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400 26,927 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 72.1 1-Core 60.5 2-Core 184 59% 105 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 432 46% 366 Pts	64-Core 440 27% 440 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia Quadro K4100M 1,157 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Dell(1028 15CD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 389.08 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Lighting 19 Reflection 18.7 Parallax 24 16% 20.6 fps	MRender 22.8 Gravity 24.3 Splatting 19.4 18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 17%
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 05CD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.53% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 7.4 3% 4.67 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 5.5 4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.53% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KN2M64-ETB Samsung M471B5273DH0-YK0 Samsung M471B5273DH0-YK0 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.9% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 9.7 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 10.7 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 96.7 41% 96.7 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	1,019x
Quadro K3100MNvidiaBench 11%, 2,978 samples	341x
Quadro K4100MNvidiaBench 16%, 1,157 samples	192x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 54%, 1,944 samples	85x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	82x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 2,172 samples	51x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $400

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16