User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHewlett-Packard
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '21 at 17:44
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 270u
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 25
2-Core 43.1
34% 46.3 Pts
4-Core 50.5
8-Core 44.4
6% 47.5 Pts
64-Core 49.8
3% 49.8 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
PwrHis(1787 6570) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 5.8
5% 6.1 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 5.2
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bory R500 240G 240GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 130 142 148 139 171 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.4% Very poor
Read 141
Write 5.2
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 152
17% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0
9% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback