Asus H81M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-K (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '21 at 01:20
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$51 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 108 2-Core 217 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 407 48% 370 Pts	64-Core 414 26% 414 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	45% Average	Lighting 56.3 Reflection 57.9 Parallax 53 46% 55.7 fps	MRender 64 Gravity 50.6 Splatting 47 43% 53.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V-gen09sm21ar256sdk 256GB 256GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0503A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 394 395 393 401 397 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 407 Mixed 371 SusWrite 378 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 98.6 4K Mixed 30.8 140% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 50.2 89% 169 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 180 181 182 182 182 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 140 Mixed 81.1 SusWrite 180 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 10,124 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	62% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 19.9 63% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 18.7 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	1,192x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	506x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	496x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	568x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	482x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	413x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	347x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	170x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	151x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	148x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	92x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $287

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16