MSI H67A-G43 (MS-7750)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7750
MotherboardMSI H67A-G43 (MS-7750)  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '21 at 01:12
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$186
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 161
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 469
51% 405 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Nvidia(10DE 1051) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.3% Average
Lighting 52.8
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 70.5
43% 63.5 fps
MRender 74.9
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 53.9
53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ortial SSD 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1130A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 195 198 190 200 197 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.9% Average
Read 212
Write 194
Mixed 106
SusWrite 182
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 14.3
81% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23.6
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 1.7
17% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 145%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB
3GB free, PID 005b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.2 4.7 5 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Read 25.7
Write 1
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 4.3
8% 8.95 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5040MM58F9F1600 RMR5040MM58F9F1600 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67A-G43 (MS-7750) Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI H67A-G43 (MS-7750)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback