Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515UA_M515UA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515UA_M515UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515UA
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210813
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateNov 23 '21 at 17:24
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 74.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 275
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 837
84% 682 Pts
64-Core 937
58% 937 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 165C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.64.07
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 27.7
16% 21.3 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 20.5
16% 19 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1292 879 341 361 351 370 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,433
Write 1322
Mixed 1,257
SusWrite 599
258% 1,153 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 75
263% 96.7 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 915
DQ Mixed 930
695% 919 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 216%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
72.5% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 25.5
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 23.8
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515UA_M515UA Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515UA_M515UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback