Komplett PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemKomplett PC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '21 at 20:18
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 85.7
1-Core 169
2-Core 324
104% 193 Pts
4-Core 659
8-Core 1,004
103% 832 Pts
64-Core 1,134
70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 2489) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 167
Parallax 154
139% 164 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 131
Splatting 114
113% 142 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 124%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
681GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z44106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1647 1759 1750 1762 1741 1128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 1,915
Write 1,748
Mixed 1,378
SusWrite 1,631
375% 1,668 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 89.4
306% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1033
DQ Write 918
DQ Mixed 370
443% 774 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 314%
Great: 311%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C18D4/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.3% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 34.4
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 31.3
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 36.2
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PC Builds (Compare 3,335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

System: Komplett PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $660
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback