Toshiba Qosmio X500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemToshiba Qosmio X500  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA QOSMIO X500
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '21 at 16:41
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 89.8
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 116
58% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 202
22% 175 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250M
Toshiba(1179 FF50) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.92
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 2
4% 3.23 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 2.5
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NFS011SA348-6007200 480GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0430A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 180 183 180 191 188 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.2% Below average
Read 197
Write 9
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 182
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 14.2
46% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
84GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.1 6.5 5.9 6.2 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C2GCM.9K30C 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
25.1% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Qosmio X500 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback