Condor CH61-PCI3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCondor CH61-PCI3  (all builds)
MotherboardCondor CH61-PCI3
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '21 at 16:31
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$136
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 464
49% 393 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.11.3
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Lighting 74.9
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 95.9
61% 78.5 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 78.3
Splatting 48.7
51% 63.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253LE120G 120GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 96 82 101 68 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.2% Below average
Read 189
Write 154
Mixed 151
SusWrite 89.5
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 20
77% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 27.4
DQ Write 45.2
DQ Mixed 27.5
23% 33.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
497GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 135
Write 139
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 105
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264AZ- 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CH61-PCI3 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Condor CH61-PCI3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback