Asus F2A85-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F2A85-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '21 at 05:39
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 125
58% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 200
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) 2GB
CLim: 1505 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Lighting 43.4
Reflection 47.9
Parallax 43.1
35% 44.8 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 42.3
Splatting 37.8
32% 39.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,748
Write 2,252
Mixed 2,106
527% 2,369 MB/s
4K Read 105
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 72.7
293% 85.4 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 290
218% 293 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
268GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 117 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 115
Write 110
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 116
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 11.9
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-M PRO Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback