Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results


Gaming 137% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 134% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E WS (all builds)
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170309
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '17 at 08:42
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Memory 95.2 1-Core 125 2-Core 249 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 469 8-Core 853 79% 661 Pts	64-Core 1,333 82% 1,333 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp 8,552 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	150% Outstanding	Lighting 228 Reflection 196 Parallax 185 186% 203 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 181 Splatting 121 115% 142 fps
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 140%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 12242 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1534 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 91 91 285 (AE) Unknown 100 100 459 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4066 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 60 171798691872 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 9442 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 91 91 9 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 36559792093 (F7) Unknown 100 100 1169081600 (F8) Unknown 100 100 3379320778	86% Excellent	Read 505 Write 272 Mixed 350 83% 376 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 99.2 4K Mixed 29.7 131% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 51.8 86% 164 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 91%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 199 2121 (03) Spinup time 198 177 7066 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6086 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12080 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1489 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 399 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 186 186 42257 (C2) HDA temperature 123 95 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	86.9% Excellent	Read 159 Write 144 Mixed 138 110% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.28 111% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 87%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 151GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 126 10091 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3145 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12275 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1482 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 416 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2728 (C2) HDA temperature 121 85 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	79.4% Very good	Read 144 Write 133 Mixed 130 102% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.77 4K Mixed 0.2 95% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 112%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90 11,249 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 50GB free Firmware: 04.04V02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 198 178 110633 (03) Spinup time 200 198 3000 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9724 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 26729 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3926 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1709 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9725 (C2) HDA temperature 118 92 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	54.3% Above average	Read 94.7 Write 94.2 Mixed 74.7 66% 87.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.55 128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2666 C16 8x4GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 118% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	146% Outstanding	MC Read 63.6 MC Write 58.6 MC Mixed 51 165% 57.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 27.5 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 56.4 71% 56.4 ns
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 141%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 78%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	42x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	35x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	28x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	15x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	19x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	17x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	8x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 34%, 168 samples	17x
M393A2G40EB1-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 95%, 199 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $92Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16