bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '21 at 21:19
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS Graphics
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.2% Very good
Memory 59.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
76% 144 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 789
77% 633 Pts
64-Core 799
49% 799 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.17.3.5
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 38.1
Parallax 44.4
25% 37.6 fps
MRender 49.4
Gravity 52.4
Splatting 49.8
41% 50.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 376GB
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 537 514 497 538 584 580 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,215
Write 915
Mixed 1,219
SusWrite 542
218% 973 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 31.4
116% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 400
DQ Write 382
DQ Mixed 323
261% 368 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 134%
Great: 466%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 33.6
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 2
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback