Lenovo 20MB001HUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20MB001HUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20MB001HUS
Memory40.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210819
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 21 '21 at 20:29
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2186M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 133
2-Core 244
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 660
73% 575 Pts
64-Core 848
52% 848 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5200 with Max-Q Design
Legend(17AA 2268) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1803 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.6% Excellent
Lighting 99.9
Reflection 124
Parallax 106
81% 110 fps
MRender 84.8
Gravity 106
Splatting 106
82% 99 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1275 1162 1126 1093 1076 1083 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2,174
Write 1,972
Mixed 1,250
SusWrite 1,136
365% 1,633 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 56.8
187% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 486
388% 542 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 240%
Great: 431%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CTD Kingston 9965657-005.A00G Kingston 9965657-005.A00G 48GB
2667, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.3% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 21.3
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20MB001HUS Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

System: Lenovo 20MB001HUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback