Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-3650 APU 2,748 User benchmarks, average bench 44% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	24.4% Poor	Memory 33.4 1-Core 31.3 2-Core 75.1 27% 46.6 Pts	4-Core 83.7 8-Core 123 13% 103 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D 4,675 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 2ACF) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	2.55% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 2.8 2% 3.37 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 3.7 3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.55% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 646GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP4O Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 43.7 Write 56.4 Mixed 32.6 33% 44.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.1 52% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 6GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.8 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 6.8 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 236 17% 236 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	2x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
WDBNCE0010PNC 1TBWDCBench 97%, 21,221 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 6GBHynixBench 37%, 90 samples	1x
M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 6,893 samples	1x
HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 6GBHynixBench 35%, 49 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16