Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Quad-Core AMD Opteron 1381 13 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	48.1% Average	Memory 74.8 1-Core 35.3 2-Core 74.3 41% 61.5 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 135 17% 130 Pts	64-Core 138 9% 138 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3643) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.3% Poor	Lighting 29.1 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 37.1 24% 32.4 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 31.1 28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT2K102464BD160B 4x8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	25.8% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 5.5 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 90.8 44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X2 260AMDBench 42%, 5,317 samples	10x
Phenom II X6 1035TAMDBench 53%, 2,528 samples	7x
Phenom II X4 820AMDBench 50%, 1,512 samples	6x

RAM
CMD4GX3M2A1600C8 CMD4GX3M2A1600C8 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GBCorsairBench 30%, 22 samples	6x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 35%, 3,211 samples	3x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples	3x