Teclast Tbolt 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTeclast Tbolt 10  (all builds)
MotherboardTECLAST F15 Pro
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '21 at 03:05
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 153
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 308
36% 280 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 7.5
6% 7.9 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Teclast BD256GB SHCA-2280 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 355 355 333 344 349 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 421
Write 336
Mixed 322
SusWrite 350
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 24.4
120% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 37.8
82% 162 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 82%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
12GB free, PID null, sandisk
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 20 36 35 37 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 136
Write 38
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 28
51% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
36% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x6GB
2 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
95.5% Outstanding
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 34.5
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 23.2
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Tbolt 10 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Teclast Tbolt 10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback