Clevo W7x0S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemClevo W7x0S  (all builds)
Motherboardclevo W7x0S
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '15 at 19:35
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4500
uPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 33.4
2-Core 60.3
22% 46.8 Pts
4-Core 61.3
8-Core 62
8% 61.7 Pts
64-Core 66.2
4% 66.2 Pts
Poor: 19% Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
SiS Mirage 3 Graphics
Clevo(1558 0801) 256MB
Driver: SISGRUMD.dll Ver. 7.14.10.5260
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 0.08
0% 0.06 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9160412ASG 160GB-$50
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0004SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 62.1
Write 59.6
Mixed 43.5
41% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.29
61% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 45%
ASMT 2105 1TB
479GB free, PID 1053
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.4% Terrible
Read 22.1
Write 16.5
Mixed 9.62
19% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.06
4K Write 0.18
4K Mixed 0.05
8% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 7.4%
Great: 53%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-22A23T0 320GB
146GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
8.77% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 16
Mixed 18.2
23% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.06
4K Write 0.64
4K Mixed 0.05
24% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.77%
Great: 18%
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback