Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 480 16,023 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Memory 51.2 1-Core 61.3 2-Core 64.5 38% 59 Pts	4-Core 71.5 8-Core 154 13% 113 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1672) 1GB CLim: 672 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.21% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 6.8 Parallax 1.8 3% 4.13 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3.2 3% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.21% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S37/240GB 240GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: H181026 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 43 17 47 69 11 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.7% Below average	Read 235 Write 217 Mixed 221 SusWrite 36.5 40% 177 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 34.1 4K Mixed 18.5 71% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 80.8 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 126 94% 120 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GB 228 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 9.8 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 6 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 156 26% 156 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	17x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GBUnknownBench 26%, 228 samples	3x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GBUnknownBench 21%, 215 samples	3x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 24%, 8,698 samples	2x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16