Schenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG NEO (M19, RTX 2060)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSchenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG NEO (M19, RTX 2060)  (all builds)
MotherboardSchenkerTechnologiesGmbH XMG_GK5CP0Z_GK7CP0S_M19
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '21 at 18:26
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 231
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 619
66% 528 Pts
64-Core 818
51% 818 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 105F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9649
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.9% Good
Lighting 82.6
Reflection 89.9
Parallax 83.3
67% 85.3 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 75.5
72% 90.5 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$88
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V6005-a9 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 659 673 679 677 641 611 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 638
Write 572
Mixed 536
SusWrite 656
135% 600 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 50.8
172% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 292
241% 345 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 136%
Great: 156%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GF2666C18S2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 23.4
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 24.5
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XMG NEO (M19, RTX 2060) Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: Schenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG NEO (M19, RTX 2060)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback