MSI H67MA-E45 (MS-7678)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7678
MotherboardMSI H67MA-E45 (MS-7678)  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '21 at 14:42
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$191
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 174
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 457
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT
POV(1ACC 915B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD105SI 1TB
867GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 19 20 25 30 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 87.7
Write 112
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 27.1
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33%
Great: 60%
Samsung HD105SI 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 109 110 110 110 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 120
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 110
71% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67MA-E45 (MS-7678) Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H67MA-E45 (MS-7678)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback