bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory17.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 17.6GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory14.7 GB free of 17.5781 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190619
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '21 at 13:09
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5680
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 152
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 663
59% 499 Pts
64-Core 991
61% 991 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)
56.9% Above average
Lighting 70
Reflection 70
Parallax 70
57% 70 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 70
Splatting 68.1
57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 424 422 423 423 423 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 700
Write 651
Mixed 662
SusWrite 433
138% 612 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 35.9
117% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 615
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 481
360% 487 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 197%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB Virtual RAM VMW-1024MB Virtual RAM VMW-512MB Virtual RAM VMW-64MB Virtual RAM VMW-16MB 17GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 1024, 512, 64, 16 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 20.1
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback