Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Battle cruiser	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	72.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '21 at 12:34
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Memory 79.3 1-Core 121 2-Core 228 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 731 72% 592 Pts	64-Core 947 59% 947 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% MSI(1462 C75A) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.4% Very good	Lighting 90 Reflection 124 Parallax 85.5 73% 100 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 81 Splatting 72.1 71% 88.8 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ldlc F7+ 480GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 240GB free (System drive) Firmware: S112 SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 18 18 73 117 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.5% Very good	Read 445 Write 398 Mixed 348 SusWrite 105 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 93.7 4K Mixed 27.1 131% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 42.7 74% 139 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 93%
Seagate ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB 10,780 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 223GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 182 180 178 181 181 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Read 108 Write 103 Mixed 81.9 SusWrite 180 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 2x8GB 23,313 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	MC Read 38.1 MC Write 36.2 MC Mixed 31.4 101% 35.2 GB/s	SC Read 25.8 SC Write 35 SC Mixed 28 85% 29.6 GB/s	Latency 81.9 49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,386x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	807x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	471x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	423x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	294x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	293x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	151x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	130x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	124x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	387x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	241x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	206x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $475

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16