ADD TO PC
BUILD

Chuwi HeroBook Pro+

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Chuwi HeroBook Pro+ (all builds)
Motherboard	CHUWI HeroBook Pro+
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210105
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 20 '21 at 06:03
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	BGD-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 375 User benchmarks, average bench 26% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Memory 31 1-Core 42 2-Core 81.8 29% 51.6 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 108 16% 115 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E63 002E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9862 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.33% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.27 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.33% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teutons Iridium M.2 SSD 128GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 82GB free Firmware: Q1205B SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 81 60 65 59 63 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 355 Write 302 Mixed 288 SusWrite 99 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 54.3 4K Mixed 10.1 54% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 32.2 61% 119 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 9.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 249 16% 249 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical HeroBook Pro+ Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Chuwi HeroBook Pro+

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 26%, 375 samples	7x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	9x

SSD
Iridium M.2 SSD 128GBTeutonsBench 47%, 28 samples	3x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	1x
TM8PS7128G 128GBTeamBench 61%, 1,941 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback