Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '21 at 21:21
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 61.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 249
77% 145 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 989
88% 743 Pts
64-Core 2,573
159% 2,573 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2905 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.47
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 21.9
54% 21.9 fps
Poor: 114% Great: 140%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1914 1826 1858 1701 1806 783 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,108
Write 1,910
Mixed 1,033
SusWrite 1648
375% 1,675 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 61.2
203% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 844
DQ Write 613
DQ Mixed 735
547% 731 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 281%
Great: 363%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
742GB free
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1943 1960 1955 1964 1958 1894 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,051
Write 1,936
Mixed 1,101
SusWrite 1,946
395% 1,758 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 61.6
202% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 852
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 742
557% 747 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 297%
Great: 363%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR64GX4M8X3600C18 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 50.9
MC Write 52.8
MC Mixed 49.3
146% 51 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 21.4
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 128%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,050
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback