Asrock Z97 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '21 at 18:09
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 627
64% 519 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 26.4
Parallax 27.2
18% 25.1 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 24.5
19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 80 74 68 58 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 240
Write 90.7
Mixed 117
SusWrite 69.8
28% 129 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 19.7
71% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 64.9
DQ Mixed 66.8
59% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 45%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
71GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 77 96 104 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 130
Write 124
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 89.1
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
163GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 124 125 125 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 116
Write 110
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 124
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 88%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 93 96 96 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 88.5
Write 83.7
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 91.2
113% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1
180% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 96%
IS917 innostor 64GB
21GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Read 11
Write 10.7
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 10.4
15% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-185.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-185.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Pro4 Builds (Compare 909 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Pro4 - $77

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $725
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback