Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_R565JF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_R565JF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JF
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210603
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 19 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 83.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 258
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 578
65% 511 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Asus(1043 1EFF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 17.1
13% 15.2 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 0
8% 10.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
799GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 90 99 94 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 94.9
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 88.5
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.5
174% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 25.8
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 25.4
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_R565JF Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_R565JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback