PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5K-E (all builds) |
Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090619 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 19 '21 at 15:11 |
Run Duration | 258 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
50.6%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
|
57.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 105 106 78 66 66 MB/s
|
55.3%
Above average
|
|||
Corsair Force LE 240GB-$85
164GB free
Firmware: SAFC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 24 27 28 27 MB/s
|
37.4%
Below average
|
|||
38.7%
Below average
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
750GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 54 56 41 34 34 MB/s
|
59%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
1TB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 54 56 41 34 34 MB/s
|
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 110 110 80 67 67 MB/s
|
79.5%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
571GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 104 103 77 65 66 MB/s
|
61.1%
Good
|
|||
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
84GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
9.51%
Terrible
|
|||
TOSHIBA MK1059GSM 1TB
326GB free, PID 1057
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 37 36 42 44 44 MB/s
|
23%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
|
20.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 55x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 17x |
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 15x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 10x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 9x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $175 |