MSI MS-17F3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF75 Thin 10SCSXR
MotherboardMSI MS-17F3  (all builds)
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200914
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateNov 19 '21 at 15:00
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 223
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 651
64% 523 Pts
64-Core 669
41% 669 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12A7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 63.5
Parallax 6.6
5% 25.4 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 9.6
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
806GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1795 1888 1802 1973 2010 2061 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 1,948
Write 2072
Mixed 1,456
SusWrite 1,921
417% 1,849 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 59.5
192% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 820
DQ Write 577
DQ Mixed 546
449% 648 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 286%
Great: 370%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
553GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 436 452 440 454 452 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 455
Mixed 408
SusWrite 440
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 43.5
145% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 349
261% 347 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD8266.C16FE 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 27.2
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 31.6
SC Mixed 22.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17F3 Builds (Compare 1,307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17F3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback