Apple MacBookAir7,2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookAir7,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-937CB26E2E02BB01
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 19 '21 at 14:59
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 130
57% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 169
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Apple(106B 011B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
7.09% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 3
Parallax 11.3
8% 8 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 7
Splatting 6.6
6% 6.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.09%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lacie Portable SSD 1TB
646GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 318 341 316 345 348 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 288
Write 318
Mixed 302
SusWrite 328
70% 309 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 24.8
79% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 98.3
DQ Mixed 114
84% 111 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 91%
APPLE SD Card Reader 250GB
174GB free, PID 8406
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 27 29 32 46 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 71.6
Write 25.4
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 34.2
52% 42.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 4.5
330% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B3445364533303445452D45474345 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.8% Average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 15.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookAir7,2 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookAir7,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback