Gigabyte GA-MKHM15P-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGIGABYTE GB-BNi5HG4-950
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MKHM15P-00  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160524
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateNov 19 '21 at 08:40
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 54.9
2-Core 111
48% 78.7 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 140
26% 179 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950
Gigabyte(1458 D003) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 32.9
Reflection 44.7
Parallax 30.2
27% 35.9 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 30.1
25% 30.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
542GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 109 105 97 65 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 328
Write 213
Mixed 312
SusWrite 90.8
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 32.4
126% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 34.5
74% 155 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 102%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
39GB free
Firmware: S5Z42102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 616 560 514 516 170 369 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,267
Write 542
Mixed 519
SusWrite 458
154% 696 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 26.8
110% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 448
DQ Mixed 329
264% 366 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 129%
Great: 277%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
101GB free
Firmware: S5Z42102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 880 471 475 482 159 705 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,179
Write 1,517
Mixed 104
SusWrite 528
186% 832 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 62.9
203% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 453
DQ Mixed 433
370% 551 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 170%
Great: 311%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
299GB free
Firmware: AX0E1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 98 99 97 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 96.1
Write 95.2
Mixed 32
SusWrite 97.7
58% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 62%
Kingston HyperX SavageEXO 480GB
291GB free, PID 16d4
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 150 155 149 149 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 364
Write 370
Mixed 316
SusWrite 182
409% 308 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 30
2,495% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 54.3
DQ Mixed 35.1
3,151% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 223%
Great: 367%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.7% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 24
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MKHM15P-00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MKHM15P-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback