Primux Primux_1406F_W10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPrimux Primux_1406F_W10  (all builds)
MotherboardTo IG118
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 19 '21 at 03:25
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
26.1% Poor
Memory 34
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 112
37% 68 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 110
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9510
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.2
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
C500 128GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 296 304 317 291 307 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 374
Write 297
Mixed 310
SusWrite 298
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 11.3
65% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 34.4
57% 109 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 232
17% 232 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Primux_1406F_W10 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Primux Primux_1406F_W10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback