Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire F5-573G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire F5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Captain_SK
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 22:04
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 87
2-Core 135
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 236
31% 233 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 108F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.5077
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.12% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 10
Parallax 5.8
5% 7.2 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.12%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM034-2GH17A 500GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 98 92 81 35 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 51.5
Write 81.8
Mixed 51
SusWrite 68
47% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
90% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR21D4S15HAG/8G ACR21D4S15HAG/4G 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire F5-573G Builds (Compare 1,666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire F5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback