Toshiba SATELLITE C75-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C75-A  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 21:31
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 88.2
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 115
55% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 158
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 76.8
5% 76.8 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA80) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.5
3% 3.1 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-000H1 512GB
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV21H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 413 434 416 422 367 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 380
Write 348
Mixed 299
SusWrite 404
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 33.5
94% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 305
218% 282 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 128%
Crucial MTFDDAK512MBF-1AN1ZABHA 512GB
379GB free
Firmware: M603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 223 233 225 227 204 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.2% Above average
Read 210
Write 219
Mixed 196
SusWrite 219
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 24
84% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 99.4
DQ Mixed 148
110% 148 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 110%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
8GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 17 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 15.4
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 16.9
26% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.5
121% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C75-A Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C75-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $77
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback