Lenovo 20S1A0NWBO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 36% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20S1A0NWBO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20S1A0NWBO
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 17:16
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 36%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10310U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 127
2-Core 204
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 298
39% 291 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 22B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4.1
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 7.2
5% 5.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CA5-8D256-Q79 256GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4Q279
SusWrite @10s intervals: 545 215 247 221 245 258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 1,200
Write 932
Mixed 981
SusWrite 289
190% 850 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 45.6
149% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 45.6
DQ Write 77.2
DQ Mixed 55
44% 59.3 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 115%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 0194 SMS4WEC8C1K0446FCG 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
69.3% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 20.9
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 21.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20S1A0NWBO Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20S1A0NWBO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback