HP 34-a090na

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 34-a090na  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4C
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 16:54
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 209
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 590
61% 492 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960A
HP(103C 2B4C) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3107
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 13.2
11% 14.5 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 16.1
15% 18.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV128HDGM-000H1 128GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW24H0Q
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 899
Write 124
Mixed 229
89% 417 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 34.6
135% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 92.9
DQ Mixed 136
163% 302 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 106%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
332GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 86 84 87 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 40.6
Write 39.9
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 85
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.6
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 34-a090na Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 34-a090na

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback