Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Memory 63.4 1-Core 42.5 2-Core 81.6 40% 62.5 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 136 17% 129 Pts	64-Core 146 9% 146 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 215A) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2555 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.51% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 1 0% 0.93 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.1 Splatting 0.9 0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.51% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST160LT000-9VL14D 160GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 11 14 11 18 8.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.06% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 19.3 Mixed 8 SusWrite 11.6 10% 13.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 8.06% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GB 7,983 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.8% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 8.5 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5 M 520Intel $70Bench 40%, 23,644 samples	1x
Core i3-2348MIntelBench 49%, 5,289 samples	1x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	1x

SSD
P3-512 512GBBench 75%, 2,855 samples	1x

RAM
78.B2GCJ.AU30C Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBUnknownBench 48%, 1 sample	1x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	1x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $70