ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20ERTCO1WW

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20ERTCO1WW (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 20ERTCO1WW
Memory	58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210824
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '21 at 23:14
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 86.9 1-Core 110 2-Core 208 77% 135 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 398 51% 387 Pts	64-Core 395 24% 395 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M5000M 654 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Legend(17AA 222F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.6% Below average	Lighting 43 Reflection 49.4 Parallax 44.6 35% 45.7 fps	MRender 51.3 Gravity 46.3 Splatting 47.9 40% 48.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 42%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SA2000M 1TB 1,543 User benchmarks, average bench 226% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,798 Write 1,617 Mixed 1,338 353% 1,584 MB/s	4K Read 59.9 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 79.2 263% 90.8 MB/s	DQ Read 961 DQ Write 487 DQ Mixed 424 395% 624 MB/s
Poor: 140% Great: 301%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 207GB free Firmware: 4L1QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1487 1032 569 568 567 567 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	253% Outstanding	Read 2,040 Write 1,519 Mixed 1,148 SusWrite 798 307% 1,376 MB/s	4K Read 61.4 4K Write 142 4K Mixed 80.7 272% 94.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,172 DQ Write 523 DQ Mixed 854 631% 850 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 253% Great: 296%
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK1T0MBF 1TB 1,769 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 354GB free Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 385 397 409 406 408 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Read 339 Write 389 Mixed 285 SusWrite 390 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 73 4K Mixed 31 106% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 130 130% 204 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 4x16GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 27.3 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 22.4 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 20ERTCO1WW Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 25%

Raft

System: Lenovo 20ERTCO1WW

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	4x

GPU
Quadro M5000MNvidiaBench 38%, 654 samples	3x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	1x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	2x
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 4x16GBKingstonBench 72%, 27 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback