Medion MD34045/2521

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion MD34045/2521  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION Z370H4-EM
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 22:24
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 471
61% 461 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Elitegroup(1019 9CE9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 10.1
0% 5.03 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.16%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$27
629GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 117 128 116 99 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 148
Write 130
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 108
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 107%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
2TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 41 41 40 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 42.6
Write 42.3
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 41.2
54% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-012.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 11.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34045/2521 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MD34045/2521

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback