Lenovo 1068FWG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 1068FWG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Emerald Lake
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111027
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 21:17
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B800
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 73.2
36% 55.9 Pts
4-Core 69.8
8-Core 75.8
10% 72.8 Pts
64-Core 76
5% 76 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3975) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 320 417 427 431 340 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 432
Write 394
Mixed 392
SusWrite 390
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 29.4
97% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 140
106% 144 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3020EC58E9F1333 Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1068FWG Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 1068FWG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback