Lenovo Sabine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo Sabine  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Torpedo
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 20:11
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3520M APU-$60
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 67.7
1-Core 36.5
2-Core 66.5
38% 56.9 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 111
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6620G
Legend(17AA 3970) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 3.5
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 3
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS542525K9SA00 250GB-$30
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBFO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 21 33 30 31 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 29.7
Mixed 14.9
SusWrite 27.8
18% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16%
Great: 31%
SDHC Card 4GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 10.6
12% 9.65 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3010EC58E8F133 RMT3020EC58E9F133 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 6.8
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Sabine Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo Sabine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback