MSI MS-17E4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star GL75 9SCK
MotherboardMSI MS-17E4  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 18:59
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 779
78% 637 Pts
64-Core 971
60% 971 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1298) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7141
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.6% Average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 54.2
51% 61.2 fps
MRender 42.2
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 50.8
40% 48.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 548
Write 391
Mixed 175
82% 371 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 23.1
103% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 133
108% 156 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 115%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
756GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 169 175 178 178 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 116
Write 85.2
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 174
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G26C16S4B.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 25.1
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 24.2
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E4 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback