Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory17.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 14:32
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 227
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 672
66% 542 Pts
64-Core 752
46% 752 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1332) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.6% Good
Lighting 87.3
Reflection 91.5
Parallax 79.5
71% 86.1 fps
MRender 96
Gravity 79.6
Splatting 72.5
66% 82.7 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2200_MTFD 1TB
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1162 1036 79 467 1270 948 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,156
Write 1,250
Mixed 1,060
SusWrite 827
242% 1,073 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 47.6
157% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 689
DQ Write 630
DQ Mixed 667
498% 662 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 175%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Kingston ACR26D4S9D8ME-16 24GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
66.2% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 18.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 18.3
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback