HP 550-102np

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 550-102np  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B2C
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150807
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 02:26
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 209
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 557
56% 457 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 292A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.45% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 8.2
6% 6.77 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.45%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$50
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 42 56 51 39 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 53
Write 49.6
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 46.4
34% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
31.8% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.6
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-102np Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP 550-102np

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback