Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3710 12,685 User benchmarks, average bench 25% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	31.6% Below average	Memory 46.4 1-Core 25.3 2-Core 50.9 27% 40.9 Pts	4-Core 98.1 8-Core 99.5 13% 98.8 Pts	64-Core 97 6% 97 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 074D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 0.6 Parallax 3.5 2% 2.03 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 176 76 97 98 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 413 Write 234 Mixed 322 SusWrite 142 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 26.1 94% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 165 126% 172 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 95%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB 291 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 196GB free, PID 1000, ultra fit Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 104 107 104 107 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD3-1600 1x8GB 470 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.3% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 6.7 21% 7.43 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	94x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	94x

RAM
KNWMX1-ETB 1x4GBUnknownBench 17%, 1,279 samples	30x
HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 21%, 6,087 samples	12x
SF564128CJ8NWMNSEG 1x4GBUnknownBench 25%, 1,124 samples	8x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16