Investronica W76OC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemInvestronica W76OC  (all builds)
MotherboardINVESTRONICA W760C
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100916
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 16 '21 at 19:24
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 38.9
2-Core 73.6
36% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 91.3
8-Core 97.2
12% 94.2 Pts
64-Core 96.7
6% 96.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Clevo(1558 0771) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.81% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1
1% 1.2 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.81%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS723232A7A364 320GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EC2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 54 49 63 51 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 31.7
Write 40.6
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 51.3
27% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16JSF25664HZ-1G4F1 02FE EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 4GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.9% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.9
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W76OC Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Investronica W76OC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback