Asus P5Q-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5Q-PRO  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090223
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 26 '17 at 22:41
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5460-$190
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 116
54% 85.4 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 230
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
PwrHis(1787 3000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.69% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 0.77
Parallax 1.34
1% 0.99 fps
MRender 0.76
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 0.87
1% 0.81 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.69%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.3% Above average
Read 262
Write 140
Mixed 180
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 24.9
95% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 41.6
58% 107 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 77%
Verbatim 16GB
10GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
7.84% Terrible
Read 30.2
Write 9.06
Mixed 10.2
17% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.14
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
24% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.84%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
27.7% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 8
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-PRO Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback