TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-PRO  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170406
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '21 at 14:49
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 216
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 608
59% 484 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 68.7%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
MSI(1462 3281)
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 77
60% 75.7 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 69
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 59.4%
 Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X04c17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 374 381 386 386 386 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 406
Write 371
Mixed 340
SusWrite 368
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 33.8
122% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 178
134% 178 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 84.4%
 Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
40GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 42 45 43 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42% Average
Read 103
Write 76.2
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 43.7
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 42%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (82nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 27.2
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 21.8
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 80%
 Great: 89%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD  $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples423x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD  $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples329x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD  $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples205x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples220x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples196x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples190x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples95x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 112%, 695,664 samples89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung  $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples75x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples124x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples58x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $647
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback