Asrock X299 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	66.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X299 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	29 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170704
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 26 '17 at 22:33
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Memory 89 1-Core 144 2-Core 287 95% 173 Pts	4-Core 577 8-Core 1,140 101% 858 Pts	64-Core 1,597 99% 1,597 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2802 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 385.41 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.4% Good	Lighting 47.3 Reflection 54.7 Parallax 187 39% 96.4 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 179 Splatting 132 120% 148 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 960GB-$59 4,389 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 644GB free Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 493 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5070 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2138 (AA) Unknown 100 100 19 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 36 (AE) Unknown 100 100 462 (B5) Unknown 100 100 63192233091806 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 1711 (C2) HDA temperature 55 248 468145668141 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 4294967295 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 19 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	42.6% Average	Read 261 Write 234 Mixed 245 55% 247 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 12.5 55% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 15.3 DQ Write 40.8 DQ Mixed 10.5 13% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 101%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160 24,471 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 323GB free Firmware: M0CR011 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2617 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1092 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 7 (AE) Unknown 100 100 268 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 46 231929020453 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 6197804815 (F7) Unknown 100 100 193733984 (F8) Unknown 100 100 61716621 (B4) Unknown 0 0 3579 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	61.6% Good	Read 484 Write 342 Mixed 339 86% 388 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 12.4 66% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 20.9 DQ Write 64.5 DQ Mixed 10.7 17% 32.1 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 104%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	208% Outstanding	Read 2,021 Write 1,244 Mixed 1,159 325% 1,475 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 24.3 133% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 36.1 DQ Write 497 DQ Mixed 253 200% 262 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 208% Great: 236%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 6,294 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 35.8 MC Write 55.1 MC Mixed 34.6 120% 41.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 22.8 SC Mixed 11.7 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X299 Taichi Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Taichi

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	57x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	42x
Core i9-7900XIntel $413Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	34x

GPU
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	30x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	17x
870 EVO 2TBSamsung $178Bench 113%, 31,076 samples	11x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA256TCK 256GBBench 161%, 2,141 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	49x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	24x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $717

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16