HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory6.1 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '21 at 13:41
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 81.8
44% 65.7 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 159
18% 144 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 8501) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 8
5% 6.43 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 229 231 230 239 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.3% Good
Read 239
Write 237
Mixed 223
SusWrite 233
53% 233 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 27.7
92% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 178
139% 191 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
79GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 80 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 74.2
Write 74.3
Mixed 52
SusWrite 82.2
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:00 00 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 ID:00 00 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
23.2% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.8
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback