Lenovo 10KW005NAX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 10KW005NAX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 0x30F617AA
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160901
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '21 at 10:37
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 209
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 391
51% 382 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 30F6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 5.5
3% 4.67 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 10.9
6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 19 43 14 90 17 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.4% Poor
Read 221
Write 89.6
Mixed 106
SusWrite 51.2
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 10.6
51% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 37
26% 31.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
206GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 111 109 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 106
Write 105
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 112
70% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SP008GBLFU266B02 Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.1% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 18.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10KW005NAX Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10KW005NAX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $51
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback